Monday, June 30, 2025

WHAT IF GETTING TATTOOED IS ALSO PART OF THE PROBLEM?

What if getting tattooed is also part of the problem?

Much has been said about whether tattoos are permitted or prohibited according to the Bible. Leviticus 19:28 is the most frequently cited verse: “You shall not make any cutting for the dead in your flesh, nor shall you put any tattooed writing on you. I am YHWH.” But what if the true message of the text wasn’t simply “don’t get tattoos,” but also “don’t let others mark you as property or a sign of obedience”?


The Hebrew verb that changes everything: נָתַן (nathan)

In the original Hebrew text, the verb used twice is “tittenu,” from the root נָתַן (nathan) meaning to give, to place, to allow, to impose. This is not necessarily an action done by oneself, but can also be understood as allowing something to be done to oneself.

This changes a lot. The text could be read like this: > “You shall not give [or allow] any cutting by a person [néfesh] in your flesh, nor shall you give [allow] any inscription of a mark on you.”

An alternative literal rewording would be: > “And you will not allow a scratch from a person to be made on your flesh, and you will not allow a tattoo to be made on you. I, the Eternal.”

Thus, not only is the act of getting a tattoo condemned, but also the act of allowing someone else to do it, especially if it has a symbolic value of loyalty, pain, or ritual belonging.


The problem of symbolic consent

In almost all cases, a person doesn't do the tattoo themselves. It requires tools, precision, and pain resistance. It requires another human being, a tattoo artist. Therefore, the act of getting a tattoo implies consent and collaboration: someone else imprints something on your body with your approval.

Whether the mark represents a name, a symbol, or a sign of obedience to someone, we are accepting a permanent form of identification on our skin that goes beyond aesthetics. Just as a wedding ring can be removed, a tattoo cannot.

This aligns with ancient practices: - Slaves were branded to indicate ownership. - Criminals were tattooed as public punishment (especially in Rome). - Soldiers could be branded with the symbols of the empire. - Some devotees tattooed the names of their gods.

Leviticus 19:28, then, would be warning: do not be an instrument of rituals, nor allow your body to become a tablet for others.


The body as a sign of covenant

The Bible speaks much about the body as a temple (1 Corinthians 6:19-20), as a spiritual seal (Ephesians 1:13), and as an instrument of righteousness (Romans 6:13).

There are also warnings against being marked by other entities: - Revelation 13:16-17 speaks of the “mark of the beast” placed on the hand or forehead as a sign of obedience to a corrupt system. - Revelation 7:3 contrasts this with God’s servants, who receive a seal on their foreheads.

The problem isn't just the outward symbol, but the pact it represents. To whom do you belong? To whom do you give access to mark your identity?


Tattoos, pop culture, and historical distortion

Today, tattoos are promoted as acts of freedom and self-expression. They are presented as normal, universal, and aesthetic. But this view is heavily influenced by modern culture and often relies on myths.

A clear example is the popular belief that Vikings were tattooed. Series, video games and art have been made around this idea. But the truth is: - There is no direct archaeological evidence of tattoos on Viking remains. - The only testimony (Ibn Fadlan, 10th century) speaks of the Rus, not directly of Scandinavians, and could refer to ritual body painting. - Modern Viking designs are contemporary graphic inventions, not historical reconstructions.

Thus, the argument "the ancients also tattooed" is weak. Ancient tattoos were more closely associated with slavery, war, rituals, or punishment than with free art.


So why does it matter?

Because your body is more than skin: it is language, it is a temple, it is a testimony. Letting someone else mark you is not neutral. It is an act laden with consent, covenant, and identity. And if that symbol points to a human being, an ideology, a fashion, or a passing emotion, you are constructing a narrative of who you are that may not align with your true dignity before God.

Leviticus 19:28 is not an outdated cultural law. It's a spiritual warning for today: "Do not mark yourself, and do not let anyone mark you. Your body already has an owner. I am YHWH."


Final reflection: What are you allowing others to write on you?


  



No comments:

Post a Comment