Thursday, June 26, 2025

¿WAS THERE A RACE OF GIANTS IN NOAH'S TIME BEFORE THE FLOOD?

¿Was there a race of giants in Noah's time before the flood?

A reading from the original Hebrew with scholarly references

Introduction

The passage from Genesis 6 has been the source of much speculation throughout history, especially because of the mention of "giants" or Nephilim and the "sons of God" who took wives from the "daughters of men." To understand the true meaning of this story, it is essential to refer to the original Hebrew and consider the broader context of the early chapters of Genesis.

It is noteworthy that the division into chapters and verses was incorporated many centuries after the original writing: the chapters in 1240 AD (by Stephen Langton), and the verses in 1455 AD (Gutenberg Bible) for the Old Testament, and in 1551 AD by Robert Estienne for the New Testament [1].

The distinction between the two genealogical lines

To understand Genesis 6, we must return to Genesis 4. It recounts the birth of Cain and Abel, who were possibly twins. Later, in Genesis 4:25, Seth, called Abel's "substitute," is born. His descendants are those described in Genesis 5, culminating in Enosh, who is said to have "been called by the name of the Lord." This suggests that his descendants were known as "sons of God."

This interpretation has been defended by commentators such as Gerhard von Rad, who points out that the “sons of God” represent the pious descendants of Seth, in contrast to the descendants of Cain [2].

The Hebrew text and the meaning of the Nephilim

The Hebrew term nephilim comes from the root nfl , meaning “to fall.” Its literal translation is therefore “the fallen.” It does not necessarily mean “giants,” as popularized by the Greek translation of the Septuagint ( giants ) and later the Vulgate [3].

Some scholars, such as Michael Heiser, have argued that Nephilim may have supernatural connotations in some contexts.[4] However, from a strictly contextual reading based on the Genesis narrative, “fallen” may allude to a spiritual fall, such as apostasy from a righteous line.

Mythological influence and corruption of the flesh

Greek mythology records the distorted memory of these events in the figure of the Titans, sons of gods who lived alongside mortals, giving rise to powerful heroes. The idea that these traditions might have a distorted echo of real history has been proposed by authors such as Alexander Hislop and Joseph Campbell [5].

The concept of “corruption of the flesh” in Genesis 6:12 may refer not only to violence and war, but also to sexual perversions and unnatural practices. Nahum Sarna suggests that “all flesh” indicates a universal moral disorder that even affected the animal kingdom [6].

Cherubs and mythological perceptions

The cherubim that God placed at the east of Eden (Genesis 3:24) had four faces (man, ox, lion, and eagle) and multiple wings (cf. Ezekiel 1:10). Their extraordinary appearance may have generated mythological interpretations among pagan peoples. This possibility is supported by studies of Mesopotamian iconography, which show composite winged beings as guard figures at sacred entrances [7].

Violence and abortion as causes of the flood

Genesis 6:11-13 indicates that the earth was filled with violence, and all flesh had corrupted its way. This expression can be understood as a direct reference to mass abortion. The corruption of life from conception would have been one of the most serious reasons why God decided to destroy humanity with the flood.

This is reinforced in Genesis 9:6, whose literal reading in Hebrew can be translated as:

“Whoever sheds the blood of a person within a person, by man his blood will be shed, for in the image of God man was made.”

This version is an inference from the Hebrew syntax connecting "blood" ( dam ) and "in man" ( ba'adam ), which allows for a broader interpretation of the prohibition against shedding human blood, including fetal blood. Although not the most common reading in academic exegesis, it is part of a coherent theological interpretation from a pro-life hermeneutic.

Later pagan practices, such as sacrifices to Molech (cf. Leviticus 18:21), sought to avoid bloodshed by sacrificing children by fire. This may have been a way of evading the prohibition of Genesis 9:6, as argued in comparative studies of ancient religions [8].

Be fruitful and multiply

In Genesis 9:7, God repeats his command: “Be fruitful and multiply, and overflow the earth.” The Hebrew word sharatz (to swarm, to overflow) suggests a vital movement. This word is also used in Exodus 1:7 to describe the fertility of the Israelites in Egypt. The image evokes a massive, uncontrollable vitality, which contrasts with the practice of abortion.

Conclusion

Far from being a mythological tale, Genesis 6 presents a moral and spiritual reality: humanity's corruption led to its destruction. The "giants" were fallen men, powerful but degenerate. Violence, abortion, and the unnatural mixing of lines and species were part of this corruption.

The text not only explains the past, but also offers warnings for the present: respect life from its beginning, avoid moral corruption, and seek to remain on the path of the Creator.


References

[1] Metzger, B. M. (2001). The Bible in Translation: Ancient and English Versions . Baker Academic. [2] Von Rad, G. (1972). Genesis: A Commentary . Westminster John Knox Press. [3] Brenton, L. C. L. (1851). The Septuagint Version of the Old Testament . Samuel Bagster and Sons. [4] Heiser, M. S. (2015). The Unseen Realm: Recovering the Supernatural Worldview of the Bible . Lexham Press. [5] Campbell, J. (1949). The Hero with a Thousand Faces . Princeton University Press. [6] Sarna, N. M. (1989). Genesis (JPS Torah Commentary) . Jewish Publication Society. [7] Black, J., & Green, A. (1992). Gods, Demons and Symbols of Ancient Mesopotamia . University of Texas Press. [8] Smith, M. S. (2001). The Origins of Biblical Monotheism . Oxford University Press.


This article is based on an analysis of the Hebrew text of Genesis and scholarly references, and aims to deepen the understanding of Scripture from a perspective faithful to the original.


 



No comments:

Post a Comment