Tuesday, August 12, 2025

THE ETERNAL GOD OF THE BIBLE – YEHOVAH ELOHIM – יהוה אלוהים

 


LET US ASK OURSELVES THE FOLLOWING QUESTION: Taking into account all the content of the Bible, without considering other books or traditions of men or religious groups, what is more feasible about the nature of God: that God is a Trinity, 3 distinct persons and one true God (the mystery of the Trinity); that God is one person, one Being, the theory of the ONENESS of God; or that God is a Family or Kingdom made up at this time by 2 beings, the Father and the Son Jesus Christ (previously the same Spokesperson or Word of God), who want to bring more children to their Family and these human beings are engendered by His Spirit?

Based solely on the content of the Bible —without adding later traditions, conciliar creeds, or church doctrines—the model that most directly fits the biblical text is the third option:

God as a Family or Kingdom currently composed of the Father and the Son Jesus Christ, who seek to incorporate more children through His Spirit.

Below is the explanation taking into account only the Scriptures:


1. Two clearly identified beings: the Father and the Son

Jesus constantly speaks of the Father as a distinct being:

·         John 17:5: “Now therefore, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory which I had with you before the world was.”

·         John 8:17-18: “In your law it is written that the testimony of two men is true. I am the one who bears witness of myself, and the Father who sent me bears witness of me.”

Here Jesus and the Father are two separate witnesses, which contradicts the idea that they are one person.


2. Jesus is the begotten Son, not the Father in disguise or part of a mysterious fusion

·         John 1:1-2, 14: “In the beginning was the Word... and the Word was with God... and the Word was God... and the Word became flesh...”

o        The Word (Logos) was with God, but was also God. It indicates that there is more than one divine being, but not multiple separate "gods," but rather a unity in purpose and nature.

·         Hebrews 1:2-3: The Son is the “radiance of his glory and the express image of his person.”


3. God has a family plan with “many children”

·         Romans 8:29: “That he might be the firstborn among many brothers.”

·         Hebrews 2:10-11: “For it was fitting for him, for whom are all things... to bring many sons to glory...”

·         Ephesians 3:14-15: “...of the Father, from whom every family in heaven and on earth is named.”

This does not speak of a Trinity, but of a developing spiritual family.


4. The Holy Spirit as a power or presence, not as a separate third person

·         Acts 2:17-18: “I will pour out of my Spirit...”

·         Luke 1:35: “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you...”

·         Romans 8:16: “The Spirit himself bears witness with our spirit that we are children of God.”

The Holy Spirit is never seen speaking of himself as someone apart. Nor is he represented in the salutations of the epistles:

“Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.”
(Romans 1:7, 1 Corinthians 1:3, Galatians 1:3, etc.)


5. Unity in purpose, not in “person”

·         John 17:21-23: Jesus prays that his disciples may be one, even as you, Father, are in me, and I in you... that they may be made perfect in unity.

Here, unity is functional and spiritual, not ontological or numerical. The same can be said of the children who will be part of that family.


So what do we see in the Bible?

·         Two divine beings (Father and Son) with one purpose, love and character.

·         A plan to bring many humans to that same glory.

·         A Spirit who is not presented as an independent person, but as the power or essence of God.


❌ And the Trinity?

·         The term Trinity never appears in the Bible.

·         The Trinitarian formula of Matthew 28:19 is discussed by some scholars as a possible later addition.

·         No text explicitly defines a “divine essence shared by three persons” as do the Athanasian or Nicene Creeds, which emerged centuries later.


❌ And uniqueness (modalism)?

·         It denies the distinction between Father and Son. However, the Scriptures often show Jesus praying, speaking, and acting as distinct from the Father.


✅ CONCLUSION:

The most biblically consistent thing is to understand that God is a divine family, composed of the Father and the Son, and that through the Spirit of God, they are begetting more children to be part of that eternal family.

This model requires no Greek philosophical "mysteries" or the fusion of persons. It is based on the clear, relational language of the Bible.

No comments:

Post a Comment