God as Family: The Father, the Son, and
the Children by Adoption
Introduction
One of the most profound revelations of the New Testament is that God
is not a single, solitary person, but a divine family in
formation, headed by the Father, and in which Jesus Christ, the Son,
occupies a central place as the firstborn among many brothers (Romans
8:29). This doctrine is not a late invention of Christianity, but has
firm roots in the Hebrew Scriptures and is fully developed in the
teaching of Jesus Christ.
1. God as Family from the beginning
Already in the Old
Testament we find glimpses of a divine duality:
Proverbs 30:4
“What is his name, and his son’s name, if you know?”
This is not mere
poetry: it is a theological question that implies that God
has a Son since ancient times.
Daniel 7:13–14
“...one like a son of man came with the clouds of
heaven, and came to the Ancient of Days…”
Here are two divine beings interacting: one as the Son of Man (Jesus
Christ) and the other as the Ancient of Days (the Father).
2. The Word: the Spokesman who has spoken from the beginning
Juan 1:1–3, 14
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with
God, and the Word was God... and the Word became flesh...”
Christ is identified as the Word (Logos), that is, the
Spokesman of God, the one who spoke with Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses
and the prophets.
Juan 5:37
“You have never heard his voice, nor have you seen
his form.”
If this is true, then the God who spoke in the Old Testament was
not the Father directly, but the Son, acting as the visible
and audible Spokesperson for the invisible Father.
Juan 1:18
“No one has ever seen God; the only Son... he has
made him known.”
3. The baptism of Jesus: three people?
In Matthew 3:16–17 we
read:
“And Jesus, after he was baptized... saw the Spirit
of God descending like a dove and lighting upon him.
And a voice from heaven said, “This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well
pleased.”
Some use this as proof of a trinity, but upon closer examination we see:
· The “ Spirit of God ” descends like ( ὡσεὶ ) a dove: the Greek verbal form
(V-PPM/P-ANS) indicates an impersonal and symbolic action, not a person .
· The “ voice from heaven ” does not imply
that the Father spoke directly, but rather that it was a sound
manifestation sent from heaven , as the Word did many times in the Old
Testament.
· According to John 5:37, the Father's voice has
never been heard directly .
In short, Jesus did not speak to himself, nor was the Father seen
or heard literally. He was a multiple manifestation of the
Word and the Spirit of God .
4. Jesus came to reveal the Father
Christ explicitly states that his primary mission was to reveal the
Father, who was unknown even to Israel:
Mateo 11:27
“No one knows the Father except the Son, and no one
to whom the Son chooses to reveal him.”
Juan 14:6–7
“No one comes to the Father except through me... from
now on you know him and have seen him.”
5. The Father and the Son are distinct but united
On many occasions we see Jesus praying, talking and submitting to
the Father, as a different being:
Juan 17:5
“Glorify me with you, with the glory I had with you
before the world began.”
Juan 11:41–42
“Father, I thank you for having heard me...”
These are not metaphors: they are real interactions between two
divine beings, within a family structure .
6. The purpose: to form a divine Family
God's plan was always to create a spiritual family in his
image. Through Jesus Christ, we too are called children of God :
Juan 1:12
“But as many as received him... to them he gave the
right to become children of God…”
Romans 8:14–17
“...you are children; and if children, then heirs of
God and joint heirs with Christ.”
Hebrews 2:10–12
“...bring many sons to glory... is not ashamed to
call them brothers.”
7. The family has a name and a heritage
Ephesians 3:14–15
“...the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, from whom
every family in heaven and on earth is named.”
God's family is not allegorical: it has a Father, a Son,
an inheritance, a purpose, and we are part of it by adoption, through the
Spirit of God.
Conclusion
The Bible gradually reveals that God is not an eternal solitude,
but an expanding divine family. The Father is
the head of that family, the Son is the firstborn, and we
are children by adoption if we remain in the faith.
This truth was kept secret for centuries and only fully revealed by Jesus
Christ, the eternal Word, who came to show us the Father and
invite us to be part of His family forever.
Problem with the word "adoption"
The Greek term υἱοθεσία (huiothesía, Strong's G5206). Let's analyze it in detail to determine if there is a more
accurate or faithful alternative to “adoption ,” especially in the
biblical context of being made children of God.
Etymology of G5206 – υἱοθεσία (huiothesía)
Composition of the term:
· son (huios, G5207): hijo
· τίθημι (tithēmi, G5087): to place, to set, to establish
Therefore, it
literally means :
“placement as a son” or “establishment as a son”.
Traditional translation: “adoption”
· In Roman law, adoption was a legal process by which a
child was incorporated into a new family and received full
inheritance rights.
· This image was adopted by many Spanish Bible translations
(such as Reina-Valera) and by the Western Christian tradition.
❗Problem with the word "adoption"
Although
“adoption” works culturally, it does not communicate
the full richness and spiritual intent of the Greek term :
1. It is not just a legal change, but a spiritual
transformation.
2. The word “adoption” can give the idea of an external, legal and
non-organic bond, when in reality the believer is born of God
by the Spirit (Jn 3:5-6).
3. The NT presents this placement as sons not as an external inclusion, but as
a destiny planned before the foundation of the world
(Ephesians 1:5).
易More
faithful alternatives to Greek (huiothesía)
Here are some options
closer to the deeper meaning:
Proposed alternative |
Advantage |
Description |
Placement as a child |
Literal |
Exact and faithful translation,
although not very idiomatic. |
Designation as a son |
Conceptual |
Indicates intention, divine choice |
Subsidiary establishment |
Formal and spiritual |
Expresses God's intentional action
to make us children |
Investiture as a son |
Rich in symbolism |
It can be used in eschatological
contexts (Romans 8:23) |
Recognition as a son |
Relational |
It emphasizes divine acceptance,
not just the legal act |
Admission to affiliation |
Doctrinal |
Suitable for theological
expositions |
Concrete biblical applications
1. Romans 8:15
“…you have received the Spirit of sonship,
by which we cry out, ‘Abba, Father!’”
Here, the believer's intimate, experiential
relationship with God is emphasized. The word "adoption"
sounds cold and legalistic. A choice like "son placement" or "establishment" may
be more faithful to the Greek and spiritual experience.
2. Romans 8:23
“…waiting for the placement as sons,
the redemption of our body.”
Here the term looks toward the future, as an act
of final manifestation of those who are already children of
the Spirit. “Adoption” sounds like a beginning; “filial manifestation” or “consecration
as children” would be more eschatological alternatives.
3. Galatians 4:5
“…so that we might receive the placement as
children .”
Here, the context is redemption from the law and
the transition to a full family relationship with God. Alternatives
such as "entering into sonship" or "recognition
as sons" can help better express the idea.
✅ Conclusion
The translation “adoption” is not incorrect, but it is limited and
culturally charged. Since the Greek term υἱοθεσία (huiothesía) did not exist in the Old
Testament and appears only in NT
Christian contexts, we can rightly look for a richer and more faithful word.
The best possible translation depending on the
context would be:
"placement as a son" or "establishment as a son",
and depending on the approach, "investiture", "designation",
or "entry into sonship".
No comments:
Post a Comment