![]()
God as Family: The Father, the Son, and the Children by Adoption
Introduction
One of the most
profound revelations of the New Testament is that God is not a single,
solitary person, but a divine family in formation, headed by
the Father, and in which Jesus Christ, the Son, occupies a central place as
the firstborn among many brothers (Romans 8:29). This doctrine
is not a late invention of Christianity, but has firm roots in the
Hebrew Scriptures and is fully developed in the teachings of Jesus
Christ.
1.
God as Family from the beginning
Already in the Old Testament we
find glimpses of a divine duality:
Proverbs 30:4
“What is his name, and his son’s name, if you know?”
This is not mere poetry: it is
a theological question that implies that God has a Son since
ancient times.
Daniel 7:13–14
“...one like a son of man came with the clouds of
heaven, and came to the Ancient of Days…”
Here are two
divine beings interacting: one as the Son of Man (Jesus
Christ) and the other as the Ancient of Days (the Father).
2.
The Word: the Spokesman who has spoken from the beginning
Juan 1:1–3, 14
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with
God, and the Word was God... and the Word became flesh...”
Christ is
identified as the Word (Logos), that is, the Spokesman of
God, the one who spoke with Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses and the prophets.
Juan 5:37
“You have never heard his voice, nor have you seen his
form.”
If this is
true, then the God who spoke in the Old Testament was not the Father
directly, but the Son, acting as the visible and audible
Spokesperson for the invisible Father.
Juan 1:18
“No one has ever seen God; the only Son... he has made
him known.”
3.
The baptism of Jesus: three people?
In Matthew 3:16–17 we read:
“And Jesus, after he was baptized... saw the Spirit of
God descending like a dove and lighting upon him.
And a voice from heaven said, “This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well
pleased.”
Some use this
as proof of a trinity, but upon closer examination we see:
· The “ Spirit of God ” descends like ( ὡσεὶ ) a dove: the Greek verbal form
(V-PPM/P-ANS) indicates an impersonal and symbolic action, not a person.
· The “ voice from heaven ” does not imply that the
Father spoke directly, but rather that it was a sound manifestation
sent from heaven, as the Word did many times in the Old Testament.
· According to John 5:37, the Father's voice has never been heard
directly.
In short, Jesus
did not speak to himself, nor was the Father seen or heard literally. He
was a multiple manifestation of the Word and the Spirit of God.
4.
Jesus came to reveal the Father
Christ
explicitly states that his primary mission was to reveal the Father,
who was unknown even to Israel:
Mateo 11:27
“No one knows the Father except the Son, and no one to
whom the Son chooses to reveal him.”
Juan 14:6–7
“No one comes to the Father except through me... from
now on you know him and have seen him.”
5.
The Father and the Son are distinct but united
On many
occasions we see Jesus praying, talking and submitting to the Father,
as a different being:
Juan 17:5
“Glorify me with you, with the glory I had with you
before the world began.”
Juan 11:41–42
“Father, I thank you for having heard me...”
These are not
metaphors: they are real interactions between two divine beings,
within a family structure.
6.
The purpose: to form a divine Family
God's plan was
always to create a spiritual family in his image. Through
Jesus Christ, we too are called children of God:
Juan 1:12
“But as many as received him... to them he gave the
right to become children of God…”
Romans 8:14–17
“...you are children; and if children, then heirs of
God and joint heirs with Christ.”
Hebrews 2:10–12
“...bring many sons to glory... is not ashamed to call
them brothers.”
7.
The family has a name and a heritage
Ephesians 3:14–15
“...the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, from whom
every family in heaven and on earth is named.”
God's
family is not allegorical: it has a Father, a Son, an inheritance,
a purpose, and we are part of it by adoption, through the Spirit of God.
Conclusion
The Bible
gradually reveals that God is not an eternal solitude, but an
expanding divine family. The Father is the head of that
family, the Son is the firstborn, and we are children
by adoption if we remain in the faith.
This truth was
kept secret for centuries and only fully revealed by Jesus Christ, the eternal
Word, who came to show us the Father and invite us to be part of His family
forever.
Problem with the word "adoption"
The Greek
term υἱοθεσία (huiothesía, Strong's
G5206). Let's analyze it in detail to determine if there
is a more accurate or faithful alternative to “adoption,”
especially in the biblical context of being made children of God.
Etymology of G5206 – υἱοθεσία (huiothesía)
Composition of the term:
· son (huios, G5207): hijo
· τίθημι (tithēmi, G5087): to place, to set, to establish
Therefore, it literally
means:
“placement as a son” or “establishment as a son”.
Traditional translation: “adoption”
· In Roman law, adoption was a legal process by which a child was incorporated
into a new family and received full inheritance rights.
· This image was adopted by many Spanish Bible translations (such as
Reina-Valera) and by the Western Christian tradition.
❗Problem
with the word "adoption"
Although “adoption” works culturally, it
does not communicate the full richness and spiritual intent of the Greek term:
1. It is not just a legal change, but a spiritual transformation.
2. The word “adoption” can give the idea of an external, legal and
non-organic bond, when in reality the believer is born of God by
the Spirit (Jn 3:5-6).
3. The NT presents this placement as sons not as an external inclusion, but
as a destiny planned before the foundation of the world
(Ephesians 1:5).
More
faithful alternatives to Greek (huiothesía)
Here are some options closer to
the deeper meaning:
|
Proposed alternative |
Advantage |
Description |
|
Placement as a child |
Literal |
Exact and faithful translation, although not
very idiomatic. |
|
Designation as a son |
Conceptual |
Indicates intention, divine choice |
|
Subsidiary establishment |
Formal and spiritual |
Expresses God's intentional action to make us
children |
|
Investiture as a son |
Rich in symbolism |
It can be used in eschatological contexts
(Romans 8:23) |
|
Recognition as a son |
Relational |
It emphasizes divine acceptance, not just the
legal act |
|
Admission to affiliation |
Doctrinal |
Suitable for theological expositions |
Concrete biblical applications
1.
Romans 8:15
“…you have received the Spirit of sonship,
by which we cry out, ‘Abba, Father!’”
Here, the believer's intimate, experiential relationship with
God is emphasized. The word "adoption" sounds cold and legalistic. A
choice like "son placement" or "establishment" may
be more faithful to the Greek and spiritual experience.
2.
Romans 8:23
“…waiting for the placement as sons, the
redemption of our body.”
Here
the term looks toward the future, as an act of final manifestation of
those who are already children of the Spirit. “Adoption” sounds like a
beginning; “filial manifestation” or “consecration as
children” would be more eschatological alternatives.
3.
Galatians 4:5
“…so that we might receive the placement as
children.”
Here,
the context is redemption from the law and the transition to a full
family relationship with God. Alternatives such as "entering
into sonship" or "recognition as sons" can
help better express the idea.
✅
Conclusion
The translation
“adoption” is not incorrect, but it is limited and culturally charged.
Since the Greek term υἱοθεσία (huiothesía) did
not exist in the Old Testament and appears only in NT
Christian contexts, we can rightly look for a richer and more faithful word.
The best possible translation depending on the context would be:
"placement as a son" or "establishment as a son", and depending
on the approach, "investiture", "designation",
or "entry into sonship".

No comments:
Post a Comment